Statement
for Commission Meeting January
23, 2012 – Sonoma County
Save Our Libraries
In
order for library planning to
be transparent, the public and
the Commissioners need to have
factual information to evaluate
the library’s projects.
As
an example, in order to make some
kind of cost-benefit analysis
of the self-check/RFID project,
you would need to see all of the
associated costs in one place,
and all of the tangible benefits
as well.
The
costs of the project include,
besides the cost of the machines
themselves, the cost of software
and software upgrades, the cost
of maintenance, the cost of renovating
the branches to accommodate the
machines, the cost of design and
engineering consultants, and the
costs associated with recoding
the collection. All
of these expenses are slotted
into different budget categories,
so how can we find out how much
the project actually costs?
On
the benefit side, how do we know
who benefits and how much?
The
machines have been promoted as
a way to lower repetitive stress
injuries and reduce Worker’s Compensation
costs. We
did a search through the Health
and Safety Library at UC Berkeley’s
Labor Occupational Health Program,
and the results of the search
showed that while similar claims
have been made by administrators
and vendors, there are no independent scientific
studies linking self-check machines
in libraries to a reduction in
repetitive stress injuries. I have
asked the circulation staff at
every branch I have visited, and
I get mixed reviews, some saying
the machines help, some saying
they make no difference, some
saying they are worse in some
respects.
- Has
the library tracked and compared
injury rates where the machines
have been introduced?
- Has
there been a reduction in Worker’s
Comp costs that can be traced
to the machines, and not a change
of insurance carrier?
- Can
you refer us to some studies
that support your argument?
For
every project that the library
undertakes, you could ask the
same questions and need the
same information. What is the
total cost of the project
or service? Who
benefits (what percentage
of the library-using public)
and how much?
•• Even
if the accounting system is set
by the county, there is nothing
to keep the library from keeping
a separate ledger for projects. This
is information the Commission
should have anyway, and it would
go a long way toward restoring
confidence in budgetary decisions. |